

Wireguard requires fixed IP addresses set for each client in the config file, IP’s internally used to identify each connected client INTERNALLY. You can ask them for a link to the source code changes they made.Īlso, im not so sure its a privacy issue. Yeah as Alfie wrote any changes NordVPN make to Wireguard need to be made public. Moreover, MY experience with NordVPN service was always optimal, so I wait more news and … better times PS: no money to try other VPN services providing WireGuard access and configurations before my three years subscription expires. They recorded the request without any promise … Moreover through their service (configured on GL.inet router) I can access all streaming and other services around the world I’m interested in.Ĭlosing the chat I asked them to evaluate the possibility to develop a NordLynx client for OpenWrt and made the configuration files available in the same way they provide the OpenVPN ones. My needs in terms of speed are not so high when I use their service with GL.inet router I can accept a slower speed in exchange for more privacy. My point of view is that IF their concerns about WireGuard privacy ‘issues’ are true (I’m not so expert to fully understand and validate the cited article … this is why I say IF), THEN I accept their choice and answer. I asked why … They explaneid the ‘privacy-related reasons’ behind their choice their view is explained in the following article: They told me to continue using OpenVPN with GL.inet router or use their apps/SW on supported systems with allow to switch to the new and fastest NordLynx protocol, derived from WireGuard but not compatible with it.

I asked them WireGuard’s configurations and they confirmed (as AnonyOne and others said) that they are no longer offering this service. I had a quick chat with NordVPN technicians.
